<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unibody MacBook vs. Macbook Pro: Windows Experience Index and first impressions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://devinsblog.com/2008/11/13/unibody-macbook-vs-macbook-pro-windows-experience-index/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://devinsblog.com/2008/11/13/unibody-macbook-vs-macbook-pro-windows-experience-index/</link>
	<description>a tech journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:51:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Tobias Carlen</title>
		<link>http://devinsblog.com/2008/11/13/unibody-macbook-vs-macbook-pro-windows-experience-index/comment-page-1/#comment-10553</link>
		<dc:creator>Tobias Carlen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devinsblog.com/?p=194#comment-10553</guid>
		<description>I run a macbook pro unibody 17&quot; 2.8 w. 8GB RAM and 160GB X-25m Postville SSD.
 I think windows performance is fairly good with a WEI base score of 6.4 with a disk score of 7.4
(Upgrading to the latset graphics drivers improved graphics performance quite a lot and if you use an X-25, don&#039;t forget to flash it with the lastest firmware to avoid slowdown.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I run a macbook pro unibody 17&#8243; 2.8 w. 8GB RAM and 160GB X-25m Postville SSD.<br />
 I think windows performance is fairly good with a WEI base score of 6.4 with a disk score of 7.4<br />
(Upgrading to the latset graphics drivers improved graphics performance quite a lot and if you use an X-25, don&#8217;t forget to flash it with the lastest firmware to avoid slowdown.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: devin</title>
		<link>http://devinsblog.com/2008/11/13/unibody-macbook-vs-macbook-pro-windows-experience-index/comment-page-1/#comment-2799</link>
		<dc:creator>devin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devinsblog.com/?p=194#comment-2799</guid>
		<description>@Jafar - this post was a comparison between a late 2008 13&quot; Unibody MacBook and a non-Unibody 17&quot; MacBook Pro (the old one).  This 17&quot; MacBook Pro doesn&#039;t even have the 9600 or 9400m video card.

Can you point me to any discussion of Boot Camp&#039;s issues with the late 2008 Unibody MacBook Pro video card (9600)?  I haven&#039;t heard of anybody having any legitimate problems with their MacBook Pro video cards in Boot Camp.  If the MacBook Pro was actually using the 9400m then you wouldn&#039;t be able to play games on it - and people are running games on it just fine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jafar &#8211; this post was a comparison between a late 2008 13&#8243; Unibody MacBook and a non-Unibody 17&#8243; MacBook Pro (the old one).  This 17&#8243; MacBook Pro doesn&#8217;t even have the 9600 or 9400m video card.</p>
<p>Can you point me to any discussion of Boot Camp&#8217;s issues with the late 2008 Unibody MacBook Pro video card (9600)?  I haven&#8217;t heard of anybody having any legitimate problems with their MacBook Pro video cards in Boot Camp.  If the MacBook Pro was actually using the 9400m then you wouldn&#8217;t be able to play games on it &#8211; and people are running games on it just fine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jafar Uddin</title>
		<link>http://devinsblog.com/2008/11/13/unibody-macbook-vs-macbook-pro-windows-experience-index/comment-page-1/#comment-2798</link>
		<dc:creator>Jafar Uddin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devinsblog.com/?p=194#comment-2798</guid>
		<description>Actually you didn&#039;t get your money&#039;s worth. Turns out Windows through boot camp is bugged. In your situation, the Macbook Pro is not actually utilizing the 9600. Instead it&#039;s using the 9400M and that explains why the performance between the two is so similar. I am in the state of choosing which I want; The Macbook or the Pro version. I&#039;m going with the Pro because of it&#039;s MUCH higher quality screen plus it&#039;s got the dedicated graphics card, don&#039;t know when that might come in handy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually you didn&#8217;t get your money&#8217;s worth. Turns out Windows through boot camp is bugged. In your situation, the Macbook Pro is not actually utilizing the 9600. Instead it&#8217;s using the 9400M and that explains why the performance between the two is so similar. I am in the state of choosing which I want; The Macbook or the Pro version. I&#8217;m going with the Pro because of it&#8217;s MUCH higher quality screen plus it&#8217;s got the dedicated graphics card, don&#8217;t know when that might come in handy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antonio</title>
		<link>http://devinsblog.com/2008/11/13/unibody-macbook-vs-macbook-pro-windows-experience-index/comment-page-1/#comment-2299</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devinsblog.com/?p=194#comment-2299</guid>
		<description>I see Windows in Macbook? You are MAD!!!

P.S.
Sorry for my bad english</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see Windows in Macbook? You are MAD!!!</p>
<p>P.S.<br />
Sorry for my bad english</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim J</title>
		<link>http://devinsblog.com/2008/11/13/unibody-macbook-vs-macbook-pro-windows-experience-index/comment-page-1/#comment-1079</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devinsblog.com/?p=194#comment-1079</guid>
		<description>Thank you for posting those WEI scores for the unibody Macbook, I&#039;ve been looking for them for quite a while! 

I really love Apple&#039;s new unibody Macbook design: small, durable and unrivalled beauty! However, I do a lot of CAD work on programs that aren&#039;t OSX compatible, so running Windows via BootCamp would be my only option. I&#039;d need a score of at least 5.0, so the unibody Macbook cuts it! Plus it saves me the need to spent an extra £400 on a MBP, as I feared that the lack of dedicated graphics in the new MBs would render them less than adequate...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for posting those WEI scores for the unibody Macbook, I&#8217;ve been looking for them for quite a while! </p>
<p>I really love Apple&#8217;s new unibody Macbook design: small, durable and unrivalled beauty! However, I do a lot of CAD work on programs that aren&#8217;t OSX compatible, so running Windows via BootCamp would be my only option. I&#8217;d need a score of at least 5.0, so the unibody Macbook cuts it! Plus it saves me the need to spent an extra £400 on a MBP, as I feared that the lack of dedicated graphics in the new MBs would render them less than adequate&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

